Yesterday I wrote a highly controversial article about the state of the EmacsWiki and suggested a few things we can do to make things better. I got the usual batch of hate mail and some remarks on the poor quality of my English and writing style (which generally amuse me a lot). But I got much more encouraging feedback from a lot of Emacs community members. So here our story continues…
On The Essence of Things
Some people accused me that I don’t even know what I wiki is. To them I’d like to say that a thing is not its dictionary/encyclopedia definition. A thing is what it’s perceived to be. People expect wiki entries to look and behave like those found in MediaWiki or Confluence and not like some mixture of a wiki, forum and irc conversation…
A Word from Our Sponsor
Alex wrote a public response on the EmacsWiki yesterday, that I’d first like to share (since probably more people will see it here, than there). I publish it here with no alternations:
Bozhidar Batsov is apparently very frustrated with Emacs Wiki. He seems to think that we should start over – use new software, add moderators, guidelines, and sorts of fancy stuff. My answer is the same as it was back in 2008 (http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/MissionRant).
One of his ideas I actually agree with. “Submit documentation only to the official project pages.” Absolutely. :)
Some ideas I am luke warm about: “package something on Marmalade…” Sure, why not? I have never used Marmalade, but I encourage you to improve the tools you use. There’s also “don’t respond to any bug requests regarding modified copies of your sources distributed via EmacsWiki.” I also don’t want to encourage bug reports on the wiki. Use the facilities built into Emacs to report bugs. But almost all of you know that.
But other ideas?
“Drop the current format of the wiki - use something standard like MediaWiki instead of OddMuse.” How is reformatting the pages going to improve them?
“Drop all the articles about Emacs extensions.” Just delete them? Are you at least going to rewrite them and move them to the appropriate project pages out there? Or are you just going to delete them? Taking away and not giving back?
“Drop all the extensions hosted there.” Some of the old code has no other home. Some of the old code is here for the poor sods stuck with Emacs 20. Are you going to package them for ELPA or Marmalade or whatever you are going to suggest instead?
Some of you – like Drew Adams – keep their packages on the wiki. For those packages, I don’t see any alternative. Are you going to maintain his software? Fix his bugs? Develop his features? Unless you are, I guess you can try and fork his stuff and keep it on whatever other system you want. But please don’t suggest taking something away without giving something in return.
“Assemble a team of moderators.” Indeed. Moderators! Where have you been hiding for the last ten years! Are you volunteering? I’m a bit wary regarding your deletionist tendencies. But perhaps you’d like to start with a new Table of Contents and new top-down menus where only the pages you personally vetted and checked are listed. That would be an awesome thing to do! Of course, there’s no need to delete anything in order for you to do this. Just arrange the stuff you like and do it.
In fact, in order to do it, just do it.
“Accept only articles about general Emacs usage and Emacs Lisp programming.” How is that going to work – more deleting? I don’t know… I don’t think you understand where the value of Emacs Wiki comes from. Perhaps you should write a book about Emacs? Collect a team of authors and editors and deletionists, take a copy of the wiki, and just do it right.
Also, less hyperbole when posting… :P
– Alex Schroeder, Creator and Maintainer of EmacsWiki.org
Here’s my two cents on the letter:
The markup format hardly matters. A new wiki engine would give us better structure of the wiki as whole (like separate discussion pages for one).
Dropping it from the wiki doesn’t mean we’ll delete the code forever. What I meant was - dump all the extensions to some archive for the interested parties and remove them from the wiki. You’re basically putting words in my mouth.
We should care for the bad choices some people made (like Drew - all my respect to his work). With so many free project hosting services I don’t feel we’ll be taking something away and not giving an alternative.
No, I don’t volunteer. Not for this format of the wiki. But I do volunteer for an alternative matching the outline I’ve suggested.
Mocking me is not right response, you know. The problem exists, you fail to acknowledge it, but I don’t care that much.
Alex calls it hyperbole, I call it the simple truth (and many others would second me).
Many people commented that my post is not worth a damn if I’m not willing to back it with action. I’m sad to disappoint my critics - but I’ll willing to go the whole nine yards on this one. Here’s the outline of my proposal for a new wiki:
Use MoinMoin as the wiki engine. It’s written in Python and it’s GPL software. It doesn’t use a database, it’s featureful and mature. It’s successfully used by Debian and Ubuntu (and many other respectable software organizations). I’m against using a Git backed systems since it will increase the entry bar for user participation. I’m even more against the use of a custom platform developed specially to serve as the EmacsWiki.
I’ll pay for the hosting and the new domain and set up the wiki initially. I’d suggest that the new project begins with the domain emacswiki.net or emacswiki.info and eventually we’ll assume the old emacswiki.org domain as well (should the new wiki be successful enough). Suggestions for another name are welcome in the comments section.
I and anyone willing to lend a hand will pick the articles worth saving from the EmacsWiki and migrate them to the new one. I and anyone willing to serve as moderator will monitor new contributions afterwards.
Wiki entries will have a more or less standard structure and will adhere and community established guidelines.
The old EmacsWiki will eventually be retired to another domain such as old.emacswiki.org (or similar) for historic purposes and benefit of users of old Emacs versions.
It this good enough for you to call it an action plan? Comments on it are most welcome!
I’m sorry that I’m the guy that has to break the terrible news to all of the delusional EmacsWiki supporters out there - It’s not special. It’s not a beautiful or unique snowflake. It’s the same decaying wiki matter like some many else. I’m sorry for my terrible English and my lack of good manners. I’m sorry I’m willing do to something while so many of you are just whining and ignoring the existing problems.
I think as a member of the Emacs community I’ve shown my worth so far and I’ll willing to do even more. But I cannot carry out such a massive undertaking on my own. I encourage everyone serious about helping out to comment the article (here, not on reddit or hacker news) or send me a personal email.
The new wiki is now available at http://wikemacs.org. It’s using MediaWiki (it turned out it had several nice advantages over MoinMoin).